In Matthew's gospel, Jesus tells Peter that Peter is the rock upon which the Church will be built.
There has been much commentary about the significance of this statement. For the Roman Catholic community, this statement speaks of Peter as the first bishop of Rome, and the foundation of the papacy. For Protestants, the rock is perceived as Peter's faith and belief.
There is another way to interpret the passage, which begins by reading the entire verse in Matthew where this statement is found, Matthew 16.18: "And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not prevail against it."
In ancient Israel, "Peter" was not a common name. You did not name a child "Peter". Peter's name was Simon Son of John (or Jonah). "Peter" was, instead, a nickname. The word Peter comes from the Greek Cephas, which means "Rock." Now that Peter is a common name, we miss the wordplay that would have been obvious to Jesus' original listeners. Jesus' original listeners would have heard the verse like this: "You are Rock, and upon this Rock I will build my Church."
When we read the verse in this context, the identity of the "Rock" to which Jesus refers becomes evident. The rock is not an institution that Peter founded or a quality attributed to Peter. The rock is, rather, Peter himself.
We can assume that comparing someone to a rock implies that the person is reliable, steady, and steadfast. On the surface, Peter's track record as a disciple appears to be anything like a "rock". Jesus told Peter at one point to "get behind me Satan" when Peter questioned Jesus' talk about having to be crucified in Jerusalem. Peter denounced Jesus three times when Jesus was facing crucifixion. In Paul's letter to the Galatians, we are told that Peter refused table fellowship to the Gentile converts to Christianity.
Peter was flawed. Yet despite Peter's track record, he was, literally, a rock upon which the Church was built. Despite his failures. Despite the fact that he may have sometimes not understood who Jesus was and what the mission was. Peter proclaimed the gospel and lived according to the example of Christ.
Like Peter, we are flawed. But like Peter, we can also be a rock upon which God will continue what was begun in Jesus. We can continue the mission of proclaiming Christ crucified and risen, and the inauguration of God's Kingdom.
"Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. I myself will be with you every day until the end of this present age." -Matthew 28:19-20
Sunday, August 21, 2011
Sunday, August 14, 2011
The True Measure of Religiosity
The gospel lesson for this week in the Revised Common Lectionary is Matthew 15.10-20. The key verse, in my opinion is Matthew 15.11. Jesus, speaking in critique of the Pharisees, says that "it is not what goes into the mouth that defiles a person, but it is what comes out of the mouth that defiles."
To understand Jesus' statement, one must first understand purity laws and regulations. In ancient Judaism, many practicing Jews measured their religiosity; their holiness by their adherence to purity laws. There were a huge number of rules that had to be followed concerning food and drink--what foods you could eat on what particular times, the manner of preparation of the food, and in particular, the cleansing of the food and the person prior to the ingestion of food and drink. The regulations on these issues were so complicated that there had to be a priestly class of individuals to comprehend and communicate them.
Jesus' response to these practices was simple and straightforward: the whole point of this system of ritual was so that practicing Jews could remember what was most important; love of God and love of neighbor, to live a holy life, and to be just in personal and collective relationships. The rituals themselves did not make someone holy.
Jesus was not telling the practicing Jews of his day anything that they did not know already. The Pharisees knew it too. In fact, Matthew 15.11 is in some ways a statement of one of the Pharisees' most common preaching motifs. But somehow in practicing their religion, for both the Pharisees and their listeners, the regulations became more important than the practices that they were meant to inspire. The regulations became an end in themselves.
There is a similar problem among practicing Christians today. Christians today have rituals and practices, just like ancient Israel. Christians, for example, attend worship services on Sunday morning. Sometimes holiness is measured today by the rate of participation in Church. Our holiness is measured by how often we are in worship, how much money we give, and whether we teach Sunday School.
Now everyone from our Bishop on down knows that this, standing alone, is not what makes a person holy. We already know that. Showing up at Church is a means to an end, just like the Jewish purity laws and regulations were a means to an end.
We need to be reminded about what our faith is really all about, just like ancient Israel. To analogize from Matthew 15.11, what matters is not what we do inside the walls of the Church, but what we do outside. What matters is love of God and love of neighbor. What matters is being ambassadors for Christ in our communities.
To understand Jesus' statement, one must first understand purity laws and regulations. In ancient Judaism, many practicing Jews measured their religiosity; their holiness by their adherence to purity laws. There were a huge number of rules that had to be followed concerning food and drink--what foods you could eat on what particular times, the manner of preparation of the food, and in particular, the cleansing of the food and the person prior to the ingestion of food and drink. The regulations on these issues were so complicated that there had to be a priestly class of individuals to comprehend and communicate them.
Jesus' response to these practices was simple and straightforward: the whole point of this system of ritual was so that practicing Jews could remember what was most important; love of God and love of neighbor, to live a holy life, and to be just in personal and collective relationships. The rituals themselves did not make someone holy.
Jesus was not telling the practicing Jews of his day anything that they did not know already. The Pharisees knew it too. In fact, Matthew 15.11 is in some ways a statement of one of the Pharisees' most common preaching motifs. But somehow in practicing their religion, for both the Pharisees and their listeners, the regulations became more important than the practices that they were meant to inspire. The regulations became an end in themselves.
There is a similar problem among practicing Christians today. Christians today have rituals and practices, just like ancient Israel. Christians, for example, attend worship services on Sunday morning. Sometimes holiness is measured today by the rate of participation in Church. Our holiness is measured by how often we are in worship, how much money we give, and whether we teach Sunday School.
Now everyone from our Bishop on down knows that this, standing alone, is not what makes a person holy. We already know that. Showing up at Church is a means to an end, just like the Jewish purity laws and regulations were a means to an end.
We need to be reminded about what our faith is really all about, just like ancient Israel. To analogize from Matthew 15.11, what matters is not what we do inside the walls of the Church, but what we do outside. What matters is love of God and love of neighbor. What matters is being ambassadors for Christ in our communities.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)